Wrongful Dismissal FAQ

9 Most Popular FAQ about Wrongful Dismissal

 1. Does my written employment contract encompass all my rights?

In Ontario, all employment relationships are contractual, but a written contract is not required. There does not even need to be a verbal agreement; when the conducts of both parties constitute an employment relationship, an agreement is deemed to have formed.

When there is an implied employment agreement, the terms and conditions of employment will be governed by both the statutory law such as the Employment Standards Act and the Human Rights Code, and the common law. The Employment Standards Act and the Human Rights Code also prescribe fundamental rights that a written agreement cannot contract out of.

 2. What is “just cause” for dismissal?

In R. v. Arthurs, Ex parte Port Arthur Shipbuilding Co., a case decided by the Ontario Court of Appeal dated back to 1967, an employer many terminate an employee’s employment for just cause if the employee is “guilty of serious misconduct, habitual neglect of duty, incompetence, or conduct incompatible with his duties, or prejudicial to the employer’s business, or if he has been guilty of wilful disobedience to the employer’s orders in a matter of substance.”

The employer bears the burden of proving that just cause has been constituted. It is a high threshold. For example, as recently affirmed in Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2019 ONSC 7460, termination for just cause is “generally reserved for the most extreme of cases. It has been described as the ‘capital punishment’ of employment law.”

 3. What is a “wrongful dismissal”?

The termination of an employee without cause by the employer, is permitted by law in Ontario only if the employer provides notice of termination ahead of time, or payment in lieu of notice. This payment is often referred to as severance pay or termination pay. In theory, the severance package should include a lump-sum of money to put the employee in the same position they would have been if they had been given reasonable working notice, rather than fired without notice. Generally, the amount of severance pay that a terminated employee is entitled to is the minimum pay prescribed by Employment Standards Act, 2000, plus common law severance pay.

On the other hand, where an employer terminates an employee without providing them advanced notice of termination or appropriate severance pay in lieu of notice, a wrongful dismissal is constituted. In terms of severance package, other factors affecting the employee’s entitlement include the terms of the employment contract and the employer’s motivations in the termination.

 4. I have been dismissed; am I entitled to my bonus?

The answer can vary depending on circumstances. Companies often require their employees to be “actively employed” as of the payment date to be eligible for bonus payments. Nevertheless, Paquette v. TeraGo Networks Inc., 2016 ONCA 618 illustrates that a requirement of “active employment” alone is not sufficient; the Court stated that entitlement to bonus payments shall not depend on whether employee was actively employed after employment was terminated, rather on compensation and benefits to which he would have been entitled but for wrongful termination. This was recently affirmed in Matthews v Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., 2020 SCC 26, where the Supreme Court explained that employees have a common law right to their bonuses during the notice period. The language limiting or removing an employee’s common law rights must be “absolutely clear and unambiguous” in order to be effective.

One recent example of employer’s success in terminating an employee’s entitlements to bonus is Dawe v. The Equitable Life Insurance Company of Canada, 2019 ONCA 512. The Court stated that the contract went beyond stipulating that “active employment” was a precondition for receiving a bonus. Alternatively, the employer “anticipated the very event that occurred”, which is the employee’s dismissal without cause. Therefore, the clause was able to restrict the employee’s common law rights on termination.

 5. Am I entitled to be paid overtime pay during the notice period?

In general, the answer is affirmative. As per Olivares v. Canac Kitchens, 2012 ONSC 284, overtime pay “had become an integral part of the anticipated income of the terminated employee and should be considered as compensable damages. If overtime has been paid in years immediately preceding the termination, it is appropriate to take that overtime into account when assessing damages for wrongful dismissal.”

 6. What is a “constructive dismissal”? What should I do if my employer is changing my job a lot? What if I am asked to relocate?

A constructive dismissal occurs if an employer makes a substantial change to the terms of an employee’s employment without the employee’s consent or demonstrates an intention to no longer be bound by the terms of the employment contract the employee has the option of treating his or her employment as having been terminated.

To be considered a constructive dismissal, the change to the terms of employment must be very fundamental to the employment contract. The burden is on the employee to establish that a constructive dismissal has occurred. The line between a fundamental change and a reasonable modification to one’s duties can be difficult to draw. Likewise, in terms of relocating, considerations include whether the job is the type where relocation is expected or common, whether the employee has a history of relocating, whether the employee has worked in the same location for a considerable period of time, and the distance of relocation. When an employee is uncertain about their situation, it is advisable to obtain legal advice.

 7. If I am suing my employer for wrongful dismissal damages, what do I have to do in terms of finding a new job?

Once an employee has proven wrongful dismissal, the onus shifts to the employer to demonstrate that some or all of the losses incurred by the employee were avoidable or avoided. The employee shall take reasonable steps to try to find a roughly equivalent job. For the employee to be able to present evidence on their active job search, the employee shall document their efforts in finding a new job, which can be done by keeping documents showing searches, interviews, applications etc.

If a court finds that the employee has failed to do so, deduction will likely be applied towards the employee’s entitlements. Nevertheless, if an employee rejects a subsequent job offer that provides manifestly lower compensation, it is unlikely that the courts will consider that employee as having failed to mitigate.

 8. If I am fired, what happens to my stock? Are stock option losses recoverable in a wrongful dismissal action?

In general, when the employee has been wrongfully dismissed, the option survives until the end of the notice period determined by the court. Although it is not unusual for employers to provide in the option agreement that the employee’s entitlement to exercise the option is eliminated upon termination, courts tend to interpret such clauses as only applicable to termination on just causes. The leading case on this issue is Veer v. Dover Corporation (Canada), 1999 CanLII 3008 (ONCA); the Ontario Court of Appeal interpreted the phrase “terminated for any reason” in the agreement as that, whether voluntary or involuntary, termination that extinguishes the right to exercise stock options must be “termination according to law”.

 9. Can I commence a legal action against my employee for wrongful dismissal while still working?

Such scenarios are possible. In Potter v. New Brunswick (Legal Aid Services Commission), 2015 SCC 10, the Supreme Court affirmed that there are circumstances in which an employee could commence litigation against the employer for constructive dismissal and still not be deemed to have voluntarily resigned. These circumstances may occur in a situation where the employee has commenced the legal action but has continued to work under protest for the employer.

Stacey Reginald Ball is an experienced employment lawyer with Ball Professional Corporation.  Our office is located in Toronto, Ontario, and handles various employment law matters, including wrongful dismissal.  If you have questions regarding wrongful dismissal issues, please call our office at (416) 921-7997 ext. 225.

Sick Day in Ontario

If an employee is sick, incapacitated or hurt physically for any reason, they can take days off work. The days off work because of the employee’s illness, injury or medical emergency are called sick days. Sick days can also be used to attend a doctor’s appointment, if the appointment is because of an illness, injury or medical emergency.

Who is Eligible

The Employment Standards Act provides that an employee who has been employed by an employer for at least two consecutive weeks is entitled to a leave of absence without pay because of a personal illness, injury or medical emergency.

How Many Days Can an Employee Take

The Employment Standards Act limits an employee’s entitlement to take sick leave to a total of three days in each calendar year. In addition, if an employee takes any part of a day as leave under this section, the employer may deem the employee to have taken one day of leave on that day.

However, if an employee suffers an illness that can be characterized as a disability, the Human Rights Code provides that employers must accommodate employees who are disabled up to the point of “undue hardship”. In other words, in such cases, the employee will be entitled to take as many days as necessary, until when it becomes “unduly hard” for the employer to accommodate the disability.

When Can an Employer Ask for A Doctor’s Note

An employer can ask an employee going on sick leave to provide a medical note from a health practitioner such as a doctor, nurse practitioner or psychologist, as long as this requirement is “reasonable in the circumstances”. The analysis for reasonableness will depend on all of the facts of the situation, such as the duration of the leave, whether there is a pattern of absences, whether any evidence is available and the cost of the evidence.

Nevertheless, the information that the employer is entitled to inquire is limited to the (expected) duration of the absence, the date the employee was seen by a health care professional and whether the patient was examined in person by the health care professional issuing the note. The employer cannot ask about the diagnosis or treatment of the employee’s medical condition.

Furthermore, under the current amendment to the Employment Standards Act due to COVID-19, retroactive to January 25, 2020, the employer cannot require the employee to provide evidence that the employee is sick with coronavirus or under an order to quarantine.

Employee’s Rights during Sick Leave

Employers are prohibited from threatening, firing or penalizing an employee who takes or plans on taking a sick leave in any way, and they must accept an employee’s request for sick leave in good faith, unless there are legitimate reasons for acting otherwise.

Although the employer does not have to pay the employee on sick leave, but they must continue the employee’s benefits on sick leave. After the employee returns to work after sick leave, the employer must reinstate them to the position that they most recently held with the employer, if it still exists, or if the position is no longer available, the employer shall offer a comparable position.

Stacey Reginald Ball is an experienced employment lawyer with Ball Professional Corporation.  Our office is located in Toronto, Ontario, and handles various employment law matters, including wrongful dismissal.  If you have questions regarding employment law issues, please call our office at (416) 921-7997 ext. 225.

Should You Accept Alternate Work In Same Company

Sometimes, after an employee is constructively dismissed or terminated, the employer later offered them a job at the same company. In this situation, it is important for the employee to understand the potential consequences if they refuse the position and fully consider whether it is reasonable for them to accept it.

Employee’s Duty to Mitigate

In the case of wrongful dismissal, the employee has a duty to mitigate their loss, either by seeking out comparable jobs or accepting another offer from the same employer. If a court finds that an employee has failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate their loss, even if they are successful in establishing the wrongful dismissal, the court will reduce their entitlement to damages.

A recent example of an employee losing part of their entitlements in a successful constructive dismissal case is Gent v Strone Inc., 2019 ONSC 155. In this case, the temporary layoff of the employee constituted a constructive dismissal, but the court found that when the employer recalled him back to work, the employee failed to mitigate his damages by rejecting that offer. The employee stated that it would be embarrassing, humiliating and degrading for him to return to work. The Court held that from a reasonable person perspective, someone in the employee’s circumstances would not have concluded that returning to work would be too embarrassing, humiliating and/or degrading. The Court also found that the employer was recalling the employee to the position he held prior to layoff on the substantially same terms and conditions, and the employer assured the employee that  he would be treated normally with no reprisals or hard feelings.

Test for Whether it is Reasonable to Accept the Position

Where an employer offers an employee a chance to mitigate damages by accepting a different position, it can be challenging for the employee to determine whether they are obligated to accept under that particular circumstance. The test was elaborated in Brake v PJ-M2R Restaurant Inc., 2017 ONCA 402. In this case, the employer alleged that the employee did not meet performance standards, and proposed to demote her to first assistant. The employee refused to accept demotion and was fired for cause. The Court held that the employee did not fail to mitigate.

The Ontario Court of Appeal quoted from Evans v. Teamsters, Local 31, 2008 SCC 20, that “[w]here an employer offers an employee a chance to mitigate damages by accepting a different position, the central issue is whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have accepted the offer.” The employee is not obliged to mitigate by “working in an atmosphere of hostility, embarrassment or humiliation.” There are two categories of elements to consider in this analysis, the non-tangible and the tangible. The non-tangible elements include work atmosphere, stigma and loss of dignity, and tangible elements concern the nature and conditions of employment.

On the other hand, in Evans, the Supreme Court held that the employee failed to mitigate. The employee was wrongfully dismissed, and the employer offered him the opportunity to return to his employment and serve out the balance of his notice period. The employee refused to return to work, unless the employer immediately withdrew its termination letter, which the employer was not prepared to do. The Court held that the employee did not act reasonably, as a reasonable person would have viewed the offer as bona fide employment opportunity. In addition, the relationship between the employer and employee was not seriously damaged, and the terms of employment were same.

Employer Bears the Burden to Prove Failure to Mitigate

If an employee rejects the employer’s offer of alternate work, the employer bears the burden of proof to establish that the employee has failed to mitigate their loss by doing so. This burden of proof is onerous. Furthermore, as the Supreme Court quoted in Evans, “[i]n case of doubt, the plaintiff will usually receive the benefit, because it does not lie in the mouth of the defendant to be over-critical of good faith attempts by the plaintiff to avoid difficulty caused by the defendant’s wrong.”

In conclusion, the answer to whether an employee should accept a different position offered by their employer can be fact-specific. The key is to be mindful that there exists a duty to mitigate and the test is an objective analysis based on what a reasonable person will do. For someone faced with this situation, when in doubt, it is advisable to obtain legal advice.

Stacey Reginald Ball is an experienced employment lawyer with Ball Professional Corporation.  Our office is located in Toronto, Ontario, and handles various employment law matters, including wrongful dismissal.  If you have questions regarding employment law issues, please call our office at (416) 921-7997 ext. 225.

How COVID-19 Impacted Employment Insurance in Ontario

COVID-19 has brought about significant impact on Canadian economy and therefore resulted in considerable instability in the labour market, and many employees are at risk of dismissal. It is thus important for employees to understand how Employment Insurance (EI) has been affected and what benefits are available to them. As of September 27, 2020, there are some temporary changes to the EI program to help employees access EI benefits.

Current EI Benefit

Currently, claimants receiving EI will be eligible for a minimum benefit rate of $500 per week before taxes, or $300 per week before taxes for extended parental benefits. For applicants with higher average weekly earnings, they will still qualify for and can receive a higher EI benefit rate.

Premium Rate Freeze

The Canadian government is expected to freeze the EI insurance premium rates at the 2020 level for two years. In other words, the employee rate will remain $1.58 per $100 of insurable earnings, and the employer rate will remain $2.21 per $100 of insurable earnings in the next two years.

Minimum Unemployment Rate

A minimum unemployment rate of 13.1% applies to all regions across Canada starting August 9, 2020. If a region’s unemployment rate is higher than 13.1%, the higher actual rate will be used to calculate benefits. This means a recipient can receive at least 26 weeks of regular EI benefits.

Credit of Insurable Hours

Retroactive to March 1, 2020, EI applicants are expected to be granted a one-time credit of insurable hours. For regular EI benefits, the number of insurable hour credit is 300 hours, and for special EI benefits, including sickness, maternity/parental, family caregiver, or compassionate care, the credit is 480 insurable hours.

Reduced Insurable Hours

The reduced minimum unemployment rate also leads to the deduction of the number of insurable hours in order to qualify for EI regular benefits. For most claimants, the number is lowered to 420 insurable hours of work. Furthermore, in effect, claimants will now only need 120 insurable hours to qualify for EI benefits, because claimants will get the one-time credit of 300 insurable hours to help them meet the required 420 insurable hours of work. In addition, if the claimant received the CERB, the 52-week period to accumulate insurable hours will be extended.

Benefits Available for Those Not Eligible for EI

For those who are not eligible for EI, they can apply for the Canadian Recovery Benefit (CRB). The CRB will provide a benefit of $400 per week for up to 26 weeks. The eligibility criteria are that the worker must be are at least 15 years old, have stopped working as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic (other than by voluntary resignation), are available and looking for work or are working, have had a reduction in employment/self-employment income for reasons related to COVID-19, and had employment and/or self-employment income of at least $5,000 in 2019 or in 2020. CRB claimants have to reapply every two weeks and and attest that they continue to meet the requirements.

Stacey Reginald Ball is an experienced employment lawyer with Ball Professional Corporation.  Our office is located in Toronto, Ontario, and handles various employment law matters, including wrongful dismissal.  If you have questions regarding employment law issues, please call our office at (416) 921-7997 ext. 225.

Employment Insurance Improvements

Since 2016, the Government of Canada has been making improvements to the Employment Insurance (EI) program, in order to better meet the needs of workers and employers. These improvements include making maternity and parental benefits more flexible, providing more options to caregivers and increasing support for workers.

Support for Parents

 1. Maternity Benefits

Since December 2017, workers now have earlier access to maternity benefits. Eligible pregnant workers can receive EI maternity benefits earlier, up to 12 weeks before their due date, and up to 17 weeks after. This allows them to decide when it is best for them to begin their maternity leave.

 2. Parental Benefits

The Government of Canada has made EI parental benefits more flexible. Parents with a newborn or newly adopted child can now choose either to receive EI parental benefits over 12 months at a higher benefit rate (the standard option, with 55% replacement rate) or over 18 months at a lower benefit rate (the extended option, 33% replacement rate).

 3. Parental Sharing Benefit

For parents of children born or placed with them for the purpose of adoption on or after March 17, 2019, they can receive extra weeks of EI parental benefits so that they can share the joy and work of raising their children more equally. When parents apply for and share parental benefits, they may be eligible for 5 extra weeks of parental benefits when choosing the standard option, or 8 extra weeks of parental benefits when choosing the extended option.

Support for Caregivers

Caregiving benefits apply to someone who is a family member or considered to be like family to a person who is critically ill or injured or needing end-of-life care, in order to help him or her take time away from work to provide care or support to the person. Through EI, a claimant can receive financial assistance of up to 55% of his or her earnings, to a maximum of $573 a week.

A claimant can receive benefits during the 52 weeks following the date the person is certified by a medical doctor or nurse practitioner to be critically ill or injured or in need of end-of-life care. There are three categories of benefits, each with a distinct maximum payable period. A claimant can take the weeks of benefits within the 52-week timeframe either all at once or in separate periods. In addition, the weeks of benefits can be shared by eligible caregivers, either at the same time or one after another.

 1. Family Caregiver Benefit for Children

This category applies where the person in need of care is under 18. The maximum weeks payable is up to 35 weeks.

 2. Family Caregiver Benefit for Adults

This category applies where the person in need of care is 18 or over. The maximum weeks payable is up to 15 weeks.

 3. Compassionate Care Benefits

This category applies where the caregiver is providing care to a person of any age who requires end-of-life care. The maximum weeks payable is up to 26 weeks.

Increased Accessibility

There have been other improvements that render EI benefits more accessible.

 1. Working While on Claim

This enables a claimant to keep receiving part of his or her EI benefits and all earnings from his or her job. A claimant can keep 50 cents of his or her benefits for every dollar earned, up to 90 percent of his or her previous weekly earnings (roughly four and a half days of work). Above this cap, the EI benefits are deducted dollar-for-dollar. However, people working a full week are not eligible to receive EI benefits.

 2. Eliminating New Entrant and Re-Entrant Rules

Under the previous rules, new entrants and re-entrants to the labour market had to accumulate at least 910 hours of insurable employment before being eligible for EI regular benefits. This rule was abolished in July 2016, and new entrants and re-entrants are now under the same eligibility requirements as other claimants in the region where they live (between 420 hours to 700 hours of insurable employment).

 3. Simplifying Job Search Responsibilities

Previously, the job search responsibilities of unemployed workers were strictly defined, which would even force them to move away from their communities and take lower paying jobs. This was reversed in July 2016. However, long-standing requirements that claimants must search for and accept available work while on EI continue to be upheld.

 4. Reducing Waiting Period

The EI waiting period is a period of time for which a claimant does not get paid before beginning to receive EI benefits.  The waiting period has now been reduced from two weeks to one week. This change does not affect the maximum number of weeks of benefits a claimant may receive. Furthermore, the timelines to process claims or receive first payments remain unchanged.

 5. Pursuing Full-Time Training

Starting in fall 2018, eligible claimants who lose their jobs after several years in the workforce will have more opportunities to go back to school full-time without losing their EI benefits.

To be eligible, one must be receiving or be eligible to receive EI regular benefits or fishing benefits, and must be a long-tenured worker. A long-tenured worker is someone who has received fewer than 36 weeks of EI regular and/or fishing benefits in the last five years, and paid at least 30% of the maximum EI annual premium in 7 of the last 10 years. In addition, in order to take training while on EI, a claimant must get permission from his or her provincial or territorial government.

Stacey Reginald Ball is an experienced employment lawyer with Ball Professional Corporation.  Our office is located in Toronto, Ontario, and handles various employment law matters, including wrongful dismissal.  If you have questions regarding employment law issues, please call our office at (416) 921-7997 ext. 225.