Non-Competition Agreements
and Non-Solicitation Agreement



Call:(416) 921 7997 Ext. 225


Featured by as most frequently recommended employment lawyer.

Two common restrictive covenants are non-competition agreements and non-solicitation agreements


​Non-Competition Agreement

Employers often want employees to sign these agreements as part of their employment contract. These covenants attempt to impose additional obligations on the employee both during and after employment has ended. If an employer wants to enforce a restrictive covenant which is a restraint of trade, they will need to demonstrate that it is justified and reasonable. Please see the article titled “Restraint of Trade Clauses” for more information and examples of relevant case law. Non-competition agreements aim to prevent employees from working with a competitor of the employer’s for a specific period of time, during and after employment has ended. This can make it very difficult for an employee to find new work, especially if they work in a specialized field and there are limited job opportunities available to them. If challenged, the employer must show that the restriction is reasonable in the circumstances. If the courts are required to rule on the enforceability of a non-competition agreement, they must first determine that the employer has a proprietary interest to protect. Courts will then consider several factors in determining whether a non-competition agreement is reasonable. These factors include the length of the restriction, the geographic scope, whether the covenant is clear, certain and not vague, and the general reasonableness with respect to the public interest.

Non-Solicitation Agreement

Non-solicitation agreements aim to prevent departing employees from poaching their former customers, clients, suppliers or coworkers. Without a proper non-solicitation clause or agreement, it would be much easier for employees to poach former clients, suppliers or fellow employees once their employment with a company has been terminated. Just like non-competition agreements, the courts will consider several factors in determining whether a non-solicitation agreement is reasonable. These factors include the length of the restriction, the geographic scope, whether the covenant is clear, certain and not vague, and the general reasonableness with respect to the public interest. This test for restrictive covenants from Nordenfelt v. Maxim Nordenfelt Guns & Ammunition Co. in 1894 was addressed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Elsley v. J.G. Collins Insurance Agencies Ltd., (1978), 83 D.L.R. (3d) 1 (S.C.C.) Employers should be aware that a great deal of skill is required in drafting an enforceable post-employment restrictive covenant. Employees should carefully review an employment agreement, non-competition agreement or non-solicitation agreement and seek legal advice before signing such a document. Please note that the above information does not constitute legal advice. It is general information about the law. If you require legal advice and assistance with regards to drafting or understanding a restrictive covenant or an employment agreement, please contact the experts at Ball Professional Corporation.


Featured Publications

Canadian Employment Law

Mr. Ball is author of the authoritative and definitive text Canadian Employment Law - published by Canada Law Book (a division of Thomson Reuters). The text is used and cited by lawyers, law schools and judges across Canada.

To order Mr. Ball's Canadian Employment Law please visit the Carswell Store by clicking here or on the button below.


“ Stacey Ball is the ultimate in employment lawyers. He got me an excellent settlement and I referred him to fellow long term employees whom I know were very happy in their outcome. I cannot recommend him enough; his name alone will give you clout. This is the guy who wrote the book. He is the best. ”
- John Cunningham, Toronto, ON

“ I was strongly advised by another client to see Stacey Ball. At the initial consultation I found Stacey to be very candid, honest and confident. He was very knowledgeable and upfront about reasonable expectations. He acted quickly on my behalf, which resulted in a fair settlement. I would recommend Stacey to anyone who wishes to use a pro, who knows the law, and is the best employment lawyer in the business. ”
- Todd Kemp, Oshawa, ON

“ I would highly recommend Stacey Ball as an employment lawyer. He was honest, hard working on my behalf and obtained an excellent settlement. I found him to be the top and best employment lawyer I could have obtained. ”
- Lou T. Richmond Hill, ON

“ Stacey Ball is the best employment lawyer you can have on your side in Toronto. There is no employment lawyer representing employees with a stronger track record than him. In my experience, he gets the results that meet your needs, even against the most stubborn employers. Had I not gone with Stacey, I would have gotten nothing because that was what my employer insisted on until he intervened on my behalf. He is the best and top employment lawyer. ”
- James Yu, Toronto, ON

“ I first used Stacey over a decade ago to review personal and business employment contracts. Stacey is arguably the best employment law lawyer in both Canada and south of the border. His intimate knowledge of the law is second to none. He is readily available for any situation which requires a quick, frank and authentic response. I would highly recommend him for both individuals and organizations alike.​ ”
- Antoinette St. Angelo, V.P. & Director of Production Services, Toronto, ON